Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 12 May 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
>> ah. This actually uncovered a real bug. We were calling __do_softirq()
>> with interrupts enabled (and being preemptible) - which is certainly
>> bad.
> 
> Hmm, I wonder if this is also affecting Mark's problem.
> 

I thought the same thing when I read it??

Mark

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives: skip with UP kernels.
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]