Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize

On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 08:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Should the futex code be using hlist_heads for that hashtable?
> 
> yeah. That would save 1K of .data on 32-bit platforms, 2K on 64-bit 
> platforms.

  I'll try to look into this.

  Sébastien.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
    • From: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
    • From: Sébastien Dugué <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH RT 1/2] futex_requeue-optimize
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]