[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch

>I've updated our loader to support this now, so that this patch is
>no longer necessary.  I have at the same time added a new field to
>xen_guest which allows specifying the entry point, allowing us to have
>a different entry point when running the kernel image on Xen.

Why do you need a separate entry point here? The code should be able to figure out which mode it is run in without
problems...

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
    • From: Christian Limpach <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
    • From: Christian Limpach <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] Reiserfs: reiserfs_panic while running fs stress tests
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/6] myri10ge - First half of the driver
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
• Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]