Re: [PATCH 4/4] KBUILD: export-symbol usage report generator

> I'd go even further and say every symbol should have a category. 

That would be a _lot_ of work. I was thinking more for some specialized
symbols first where the meaning is very clear. Also someone has to 
write the infrastructure first.

> These 
> catgories than could get labels such as mostly stable

I don't labels like "stable" etc. very much because it would give false
expectations to external users.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 4/4] KBUILD: export-symbol usage report generator
    • From: [email protected] (Ram Pai)
  • Re: [PATCH 4/4] KBUILD: export-symbol usage report generator
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 4/4] KBUILD: export-symbol usage report generator
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: ext3 metadata performace
• Next by Date: Linux poll() <sigh> again
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KBUILD: export-symbol usage report generator
• Next by thread: ata_piix failure on ich6m
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]