On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:17:50AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Would an asm clobber of GPR13 in the schedule routines (or a wrapper > for them, or whatever) work? No. The address is cse'd symbolically long before the r13 reference is exposed. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- From: Richard Henderson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- Prev by Date: Re: Stability of 2.6.17-rc3?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] block/ub.c: Increase number of partitions for usb storage
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Make powerpc64 use __thread for per-cpu variables
- Index(es):