On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:45:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > One last time: your kind of patches actually increases the odds of new bug > > staying unnoticed. > > Your using kind of a broad brush .. What do you mean "your kind of > patches" ? "Just to make gcc STFU" variety you seem to be advocating in these threads. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/6] myri10ge - Add missing PCI IDs
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
- Index(es):