On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:24:49AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Please find the updated patch, which changes the interface of timespec_sub()
> > as suggested in the review comments
> >
> > ...
> >
> > /*
> > - * sub = end - start, in normalized form
> > + * sub = lhs - rhs, in normalized form
> > */
> > -static inline void timespec_sub(struct timespec *start, struct timespec *end,
> > - struct timespec *sub)
> > +static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec *lhs,
> > + struct timespec *rhs)
> > {
>
> I'd have thought that it would be more consistent and a saner interface to
> use pass-by-value:
>
> static inline struct timespec timespec_sub(struct timespec lhs,
> struct timespec rhs)
>
> It should generate the same code.
>
> I mentioned this last time - did you choose to not do this for some reason,
> or did it just slip past?
Sorry, that definitely slip past.
I'll send another update
Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
