Re: Stability of 2.6.17-rc3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Was hoping 2.6.17 would be out within one week, doesn't look like it
> is going to happen.
> My thesis defense is coming up, need to merge my patches against some kernel
> (requiring 2.6.16.1 looks weird).
>
Surprisingly I'm in the same position ^_^ Basing my patches on 2.6.16 makes 
a lot of changes produce compiler warnings again (e.g. due to changed 
prototypes in ipt_* matches and targets).

> On a machine that 2.6.16.1 runs bug-free, is it sane to assume
> 2.6.17-rc3 will as well?
> If it fails outright, I can revert, but if it is unstable I'm going to
> have some problems.
> (You would be surprised how long it took me to discover a mistake that
> sys_rename(on any filesystem) -> deadlock with my custom patch).

If it is a kernel problem, report it. If it is a problem of your patch, 
well, I suppose you need to fix it then. :/


Jan Engelhardt
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux