Hi - On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:40:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > It is reasonable to want to see code that exercises this function. > > Until systemtap does, hand-written examples can surely be provided. > > It's not about examples, it's about in-kernel users. Just as for kprobes, this facility is for dynamically generated kernel-resident code. Just as for kprobes, there is nothing there to submit to lkml to be "in-kernel" in that sense. - FChE - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- References:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- From: Richard J Moore <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- From: [email protected] (Frank Ch. Eigler)
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- Prev by Date: [patch 1/8] nmi watchdog header cleanup
- Next by Date: RE: [PATCH 2/3] swiotlb: create __alloc_bootmem_low_nopanic and add support in SWIOTLB
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- Index(es):
 |