On Tue, 9 May 2006, Prasanna S Panchamukhi wrote:
> This patch removes the breakpoints if the pages read from the page
> cache contains breakpoints. If the pages containing the breakpoints
> is copied from the page cache, the copied image would also contain
> breakpoints in them. This could be a major problem for tools like
> tripwire etc and cause security concerns, hence must be prevented.
> This patch hooks up the actor routine, checks if the executable was
> a probed executable using the file inode and then replaces the
> breakpoints with the original opcodes in the copied image.
You've done a nice job of making the code look like kernel code
throughout, it's a much tidier patchset than many.
With that said... it looks to me like one of the scariest and
most inappropriate sets I can remember. Getting the kernel to
connive in presenting an incoherent view of its pagecache:
I don't think we'd ever want that.
There's all kinds of things that could be said about the details
(your locking is often insufficient, for example); but there's a
lot going on, and it doesn't seem worth going through this line
by line, when the whole concept seems so unwelcome.
You've a big task to convince people that this is something the
Linux kernel will want: and perhaps you'll succeed - good luck.
But please approach what you're trying to do from userspace:
you can patch the binaries from there if you wish (but not on
my system, thanks). Or perhaps you can patch it all into the
kernel via kprobes itself, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]