> > Anybody want to comment on the performance impact of making > local_irq_* non-inline functions? I would guess for that much inline code it will be even a win to not inline because it will save icache. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery
- From: Christian Limpach <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery
- References:
- [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery
- From: Christian Limpach <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 1/17] Infrastructure to mark exported symbols as unused-for-removal-soon
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 33/35] Add the Xenbus sysfs and virtual device hotplug driver.
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/35] subarch support for controlling interrupt delivery
- Index(es):