On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It's also wrong. There's more than one hypervisor and Xen shouldn't just > > grab this namespace. make it xen_ or xenhv_. > > You should reject the recent "hypervisor file system" with the same > argument then. I prefer it would become lparfs or something like that indeed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- References:
- [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- Next by Date: RE: [RFC] [PATCH 3/6] Kprobes: New interfaces for user-space probes
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
- Index(es):
 |