Re: [Patch 1/8] Setup

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> +static inline void delayacct_end(struct timespec *start, struct timespec *end,
> +				u64 *total, u32 *count)
> +{
> +	struct timespec ts = {0, 0};
> +	s64 ns;
> +
> +	do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(end);
> +	timespec_sub(&ts, start, end);
> +	ns = timespec_to_ns(&ts);
> +	if (ns < 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&current->delays->lock);
> +	*total += ns;
> +	(*count)++;
> +	spin_unlock(&current->delays->lock);
> +}

- too large to be inlined

- The initialisation of `ts' is unneeded (maybe it generated a bogus
  warning, but it won't do that if you switch timespec_sub to
  return-by-value)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/