Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables

On Saturday 06 May 2006 10:25, Hugh Dickins wrote:
<snip>

> How was Ray Bryant's shared,anonymous,fork,munmap,private bug of
> 25 Jan resolved?  We didn't hear the end of that.
>

I never heard anything back from Dave, either.

> Hugh
> -

<snip>

-- 
Ray Bryant
AMD Performance Labs                   Austin, Tx
512-602-0038 (o)                 512-507-7807 (c)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
  - From: Dave McCracken <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
  - From: Dave McCracken <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
  - From: Dave McCracken <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
  - From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] fix pciehp compile issue when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fs: fcntl_setlease defies lease_init assumptions
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] New version of shared page tables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]