Re: How can I boost block I/O performance

[Dave Pitts <dpitts@cozx.com>]

Avi Kivity wrote:

> Dave Pitts wrote:
>
> > Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > > Dave Pitts wrote:
> > >
> > > > procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- 
> > > > ----cpu----
> > > > r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs 
> > > > us sy id wa
> > > > 4  0    720  80252   1820 7077456    0    0     9   852    5    11  
> > > > 1 14 84  0
> > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > 5  0    720  90364   1860 7067080    0    0    40 66956 17995 
> > > > 95384  0 17 82  0
> > > >
> > > > This test is running several NFS clients to a RAID disk storage 
> > > > array. I also see the
> > > > same behavior when running SFTP transfers. What I'd like is a more 
> > > > even block
> > > > out behavior (even at the expense of other apps as this is a file 
> > > > server not an app
> > > > server).  The values that I've been hacking are the 
> > > > dirty_writeback_centisecs,
> > > > dirty_background_ratio, etc. Am I barking up the wrong tree?
> > >
> > >
> > > No  iowait time, plenty of idle time: looks like you are network 
> > > bound. What time of network are you running?
> > Well, it's an 8 cpu system. Does the idle time reflect the idle time 
> > of all cpu's?
>
>
> It's an average across all cpus. But the numbers are low even for a 
> single cpu system.

OK, I ran some tests, bypassing NFS, and got the following vmstat display:

procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- 
----cpu----
r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy 
id wa
4  1    696  80692    844 7225424    0    0    92 263924 14380  6176  2 
40 46 12
6  0    696 108668    784 7200936    0    0   456  6444 30515 20641  3 
57 36  3
5  1    696 100916    768 7211220    0    0   508 97276 31761 19916  3 
65 27  4
7  0    700  91188    764 7217340    0    0   428 121576 28704 21957  3 
69 24 3
3  3    700 103356    780 7204472    0    0   408 121748 29513 22603  3 
66 23 8
7  0    700  92836    780 7216168    0    0   360 43508 28784 21410  3 
54 33 11
7  0    700  88364    768 7224272    0    0   296 158236 26530 17570  3 
66 21 10
10  0    700  91068    776 7219096    0    0   444 141456 30306 16053  3 
74 16 7
5  2    700 102212    752 7206676    0    0   340 170076 29249 14872  2 
69 19 10
11  0    700  87884    768 7222096    0    0   392 143312 29743 19808  1 
65 23 11
8  0    700 104692    744 7204644    0    0   240 159624 25814 18747  3 
58 20 19
9  0    700 107196    736 7205196    0    0   344 148500 28191 18113  3 
70 21 6
16  1    700  99300    768 7211364    0   12   464 164348 25671 18326  4 
64 18 15
5  4    700 107412   1052 7204824    0    0   936 170904 28994 17062  3 
73 11 14
8  1    700  98892   1284 7217512    0    0   596 182708 31520 18424  1 
76 13 10

This ia with 6 concurrent data streams. In addition to the 
/proc/sys/vm/dirty* values I  also adjusted
values in mm/page-writeback.c  eg. MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES to 8192 . Our 
goal is to blast out
as much as possible per pdflush invocation.

> > The network is a Gigabit Ethernet.
>
> I'd make sure the nics know that by running ethtool (on the clients as 
> well as on the server).


--
Dave Pitts                   PULLMAN: Travel and sleep in safety and comfort.
dpitts@cozx.com              My other RV IS a Pullman (Colorado Pine).
http://www.cozx.com/~dpitts

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/