On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:00:29PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> >I stand by my first reply to your comment WRT the API.
>
> Actually, on rereading, it seems like I was a bit confused about
> your proposal. I don't think you specified anyway the units
> returned by your new sched_clock(). So it is identical to my
> "corrected" interface :\
Okay, so that presumably means we have to either stick with what we
currently have, or go the whole hog and re-implement the sched_clock()
support?
IOW, my patch on 2nd May isn't of any use as it currently stands?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
