Joachim Fritschi <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Testing:
> -----------
> The code passed the kernel test module and passed automated tests on a
> dm-crypt volume reading/writing large files with alternating modules ( c /
> assembler ) and comparing results. It is also running on my workstation for
> over a week now.
It would be good if you could run some random input encrypt/decrypt tests
comparing the C reference version with yours. We have had bad luck
with assembler functions not quite implementing the same cipher
in the past.
>
> Please have a look, try, improve and criticise.
Is it really needed to duplicate all the C code and tables - can't that
be shared with the portable C code?
Also don't make it a separate config - it should just be a replacement
on x86-64.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]