Re: [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Either way, it will use more stack; the mere fact that whilst it's using the
> > value, the compiler may stash it in a register is irrelevant.
> 
> Is the stack usage very close to exceeding 4 KB?  Could saving one more
> pointer on the stack cause a problem?

I suspect you don't know since it's a stacked filesystem.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux