* Nigel Cunningham ([email protected]) wrote:
> :) Tongue was firmly in cheek. I guess I should have said more initially. It
I figured it was a bit tongue in cheek ;-)
> wasn't so much the patch, as the speed with which they're coming. It makes me
> (at least) feel like the stable series is unstable. Couldn't you store them
> up for a day or two at a time (unless of course they really are that
> important that they require a quicker cycle).
Typically we do. The security patches tend to go out straight away,
unless they are very low risk, at which point they are batched with the
others. But once we know of a user triggerable security hole, it's
best to release rather than sit on it.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
