Re: [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/4/06, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +static int ecryptfs_statfs(struct super_block *sb, struct kstatfs *buf)
> > +{
> > +     int rc = 0;
> > +
> > +     ecryptfs_printk(KERN_DEBUG, "Enter\n");
> > +     rc = vfs_statfs(ECRYPTFS_SUPERBLOCK_TO_LOWER(sb), buf);
> > +     ecryptfs_printk(KERN_DEBUG, "Exit; rc = [%d]\n", rc);
> > +     return rc;
> > +}
>
> This is ugly. Could you remove the debugging, or at least use dprintk?

On 5/4/06, Michael Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
How would dprintk differ from the current approach with ecryptfs_printk?

Not much, so please just kill the function tracing stuffs. Thanks.

                                          Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux