Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?

Hi,

My debian testing has gcc-4.0.3 and gcc-4.1.0 available.
I am using gcc-4.0.3 to compile the kernel but I was wondering if
there is a reason not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?

The computer is stable, no problems with compiling the kernel
with gcc-4.0.3.

Does anyone has good or bad experience and thus advice on it?

Best Regards,
Maciej


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?
    • From: Ismail Donmez <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Problem while applying patch to 2.6.9 kernel
• Next by Date: Re: Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?
• Previous by thread: www.softpanorama.org: sparc_vs_x86 fun
• Next by thread: Re: Any reasons not to use gcc-4.1.0 ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]