> x86_64 uses numerous x86 files in this manner, and now we we have x86 using
> a couple of x86_64 files in a siilar manner. I think this is a bad thing,
> and that we should make all these cross-references operate in the same
> direction rather than in both directions. x86_64 developers already have
> to deal with this problem, so why make start burdening x86 developers also?
So far the only complaints
I heard was from a few people who deleted everything but arch/i386.
I wasn't very sympathetic to that particular problem because doing
so means they don't care about other architectures at all.
>
>
> Anyway. Andi, I'll drop x86_64-mm-new-northbridge-fix.patch. Please add
> these exports to your copy of x86_64-mm-new-northbridge.patch
It's already in the version on firstfloor. Just resync with that.
-Andi
P.S.: Since ff connectivity has been spotty in the past I'm also
working on mirroring the patches directly to ftp.x86-64.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
