Re: [PATCH] symlink nesting level change

> But I guess as major distros are 2.6.16-based, this is a good time to make
> this change.

several major distros already had this set to 8 anyway :

and your argument that this is a behavior break... holds for any
improvement and new driver to the kernel as well.. at some point it's
"if you use the new behavior, don't assume you can go back without
losing it"


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Too many levels of symbolic links
    • From: "Brian D. McGrew" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Too many levels of symbolic links
    • From: Linda Walsh <[email protected]>
  • Re: Too many levels of symbolic links
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] symlink nesting level change
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] symlink nesting level change
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipg: redundancy with mii.h
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] symlink nesting level change
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] symlink nesting level change
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]