Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c

On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 22:45 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > -		fddef = &get_cpu_var(fdtable_defer_list);
> > +		fddef = &__get_cpu_var(fdtable_defer_list);
> 
> ok, the bug you found is real - but i dont like the fix: now we will be 
> using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code, which will trip up under 
> DEBUG_PREEMPT. Since in this particular case any CPU is fine, 
> per_cpu(...,raw_smp_processor_id()) ought to do the trick. Mind to 
> update the patch?

Sure I can do it, not exactly high priority considering it's never been
observed ..

Daniel 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt] revert bh_lru_lock() to preempt_disable()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt] revert bh_lru_lock() to preempt_disable()
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
• Next by thread: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]