Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix

Mark Lord wrote (ao):
> Sander wrote:
> >The message "PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x40000100" gives no result in
> >Google. Could this be a broken or miss-seated controller?
> 
> Yes. Those bits mean: "no target response within 4 PCI clock cycles".
> 
> In English, I believe the translation is "dead/disconnected controller".

Thank you for explaining the error and the translation. 

I'll try to re-seat it then, and replace it when that fails.

	With kind regards, Sander

-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
    • From: Sander <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
    • From: Sander <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] New, yet unsupported USB-Ethernet adaptor
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
• Next by thread: We hit ext3_warning (inode->i_sb, "ext3_block_to_path", "block < 0");
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]