Hi Jörn,
Jörn Engel <[email protected]> wrote on 05/03/2006 03:22:39 PM:
> On Wed, 3 May 2006 15:18:41 +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> >
> o People are not forced to follow the convention. If they don't and
> you break an existing application, you get the blame.
Sure, but this is really just a matter of definition. The kernel defines
the ABI, right?. User space has to follow the rules. If they break the
rules
that's badluck for the userspace tools. Currently you can also
get kernel information directly from /dev/mem. If an application
does that, nobody would say, that we are not allowed to change
kernel data structures because of that user space application.
> o Now you have a dependency on the standard parser, which is in
> userspace. Any bug in any version of the standard parser and...
At least this parser should be well tested, if everybody uses it.
But maybe I am completely wrong here ....
Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
