Hi David, On Wed, 3 May 2006, David Gómezz wrote: > I'll test it tomorrow ASAP. For now, here is another patch removing > more dead code. This code is never reached (NOTGRACE is not defined) > and the *fiber_detect functions are subsequently never used. No need to resend this one, but in future, please follow the proper patch format: http://www.zipworld.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- From: David Gómez <[email protected]>
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- From: David Vrabel <[email protected]>
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- From: David Vrabel <[email protected]>
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/3] ipg: leaks in ipg_probe
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipg: leaks in ipg_probe
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipg: leaks in ipg_probe
- From: Francois Romieu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipg: leaks in ipg_probe
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ipg: removing more dead code
- From: David Gómez <[email protected]>
- Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- Prev by Date: Re: IP1000 gigabit nic driver
- Next by Date: RE: Problem while applying patch to 2.6.9 kernel
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] ipg: removing more dead code
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipg: leaks in ipg_probe
- Index(es):
 |