Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 May 2006 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>>>><EOE>new stack 0 (0 0 0 10082 10)
>>>>
>>>>Looks like <rubbish> <SS> <RSP> <RFLAGS> <CS> to me, ...
>>>
>>>Hmm, right.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Hmm weird. There isn't anything resembling an exception frame at the top of the
>>>>>stack. No idea how this could happen.
>>>>
>>>>... which is a valid frame where the stack pointer was corrupted before the exception occurred. One more printed
>>
>>item
>>
>>>>(or rather, starting items at estack_end[-1]) would allow at least seeing what RIP this came from.
>>>
>>>Any can you add that please and check?
>>
>>???
>
>
> Sorry I meant to write Andy but left out the d :-( - he did the testing
> on the machine that showed the problem.
Heh, happy to do the testing. Just to make sure I am doing the right
thing, you want an entire stack frame dropped out in the case that
SS/RSP are 0; so we get the RIP.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
