Re: sched_clock() uses are broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 03 May 2006 09:09, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> Given that most people are going to end up using the pm_timer anyway, I
> don't see the point of even having a sched_clock().  If it's jiffy
> resolution, it's useless.  If it's wildly inaccurate (as it is in the
> SMP case, monotonicity issues aside) it's more than useless.

For sched_clock TSC is always used and it's fine - sched_clock
doesn't require the guarantees that make TSC often useless otherwise

e.g. the scheduler is designed to only use it on one CPU 
and can also tolerate variations scaling with frequency.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux