Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's really strange - i wonder why the backtracer can't find the original
stack. Should probably add some printk diagnosis here.

Can you send the output with this patch?

Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ void show_trace(unsigned long *stack)
 			HANDLE_STACK (stack < estack_end);
 			i += printk(" <EOE>");
 			stack = (unsigned long *) estack_end[-2];
+			printk("new stack %lx (%lx %lx %lx %lx %lx)\n", stack, estack_end[0], estack_end[-1], estack_end[-2], estack_end[-3], estack_end[-4]);
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (irqstack_end) {

Thanks for running this Andy:

http://test.kernel.org/abat/30183/debug/console.log
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux