Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA

Andi Kleen wrote:

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 21:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:

i386: Panic the system early when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA

nah! Lets just fix the zone sizing bug ...

The problem is that nobody regression tests it. So even if you fix it
now it will be likely broken again in a few months.

We can add a box to the test.kernel.org harness easily enough, and
it will show up with an eerie red glow.

M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC, PATCH] cond_resched() added to close_files()
• Next by Date: Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
• Previous by thread: Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
• Next by thread: Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]