Re: Compiling C++ modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 2, 2006, at 11:15:25, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:04:23PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
BTW, C++ could take over some of sparse's function:

And the point of that would be? sparse is _fast_ and easy to modify; g++ is neither.

For example; you can run _both_ a full sparse with all checks _and_ "gcc -Wall -Wextra -Werror -g -O2" in less time than it takes to _just_ run "g++ -O0" on a nearly identical file. If you have some new typechecking to do, figure out how to add it to sparse without cluttering up the syntax, don't convert the thing to C++, slow down the compile, etc.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux