> > Add some comments to rcu_pending() and rcu_needs_cpu(). > > But these are internal interfaces for RCU, so doesn't seem like they > should go into docbook. Quite different than (say) rcu_read_lock() > or call_rcu(). > > How about something like the following instead? Fine with me :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_needs_cpu() interface
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- [patch] RCU: add comments to rcu_pending/rcu_needs_cpu
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] RCU: add comments to rcu_pending/rcu_needs_cpu
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
- [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- Prev by Date: Re: + fix-compile-error-undefined-reference-for-sparc64.patch added to -mm tree
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ipg: removal of unreachable code
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] RCU: add comments to rcu_pending/rcu_needs_cpu
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] RCU: introduce rcu_soon_pending() interface
- Index(es):
 |