Re: [PATCH] s390: Hypervisor File System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 1, 2006, at 16:38:15, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:18:46AM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Apr 29, 2006, at 17:55:01, Greg KH wrote:
relayfs is for that. You can now put relayfs files in any ram based file system (procfs, ramfs, sysfs, debugfs, etc.)

But you can't twiddle relayfs with echo and cat; it's more suited to high-bandwidth transfers than anything else, no?

Yes.

So my question stands: What is the _recommended_ way to handle simple data types in low-bandwidth/frequency multiple-valued transactions to hardware? Examples include reading/modifying framebuffer settings (currently done through IOCTLS), s390 current state (up for discussion), etc. In these cases there needs to be an atomic snapshot or write of multiple values at the same time. Given the situation it would be _nice_ to use sysfs so the admin can do it by hand; makes things shell scriptable and reduces the number of binary compatibility issues.

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux