Re: [PATCH 7/7] uts namespaces: Implement CLONE_NEWUTS flag

On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 16:11 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Might be worth a separate patch to change over all those helpers in
> fork.c?  (I think they were all brought in along with the sys_unshare
> syscall)

I'd be a little scared to touch good, working code, but it couldn't hurt
to see the patch.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 7/7] uts namespaces: Implement CLONE_NEWUTS flag
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 6/7] uts namespaces: remove system_utsname
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 7/7] uts namespaces: Implement CLONE_NEWUTS flag
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 7/7] uts namespaces: Implement CLONE_NEWUTS flag
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 7/7] uts namespaces: Implement CLONE_NEWUTS flag
    • From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Make RCU API inaccessible to non-GPL Linux kernel modules
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Profile likely/unlikely macros
• Previous by thread: rwlock bad magic, spinlock recursion, spinlock lockup on CPU#0 &
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]