Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:34:09 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> This all looks fairly (but trivially) dependent upon the 64-bit-resource
> patches in Greg's tree.  
yes.

> Greg, were you planning on merging them in the post-2.6.17 flood?
> 

For kdump, I'm glad if it can be mergerd.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory
  - From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Lhms-devel] Re: [PATCH] register hot-added memory to iomem resource
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3] cell: 2.6.17-rc3 bug fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory
Next by thread: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction - assorted raid10/raid1 fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]