On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> hm. I'm leaning more towards doing something expedient and obvious for
> 2.6.17. It's pretty late in the cycle, and the only downside is the loss
> of a kbyte or two. Plus I'll be at linuxtag next week and won't be around to
> help out.
>
> So if it's OK, can we do something minimal, revisit it after 2.6.17?
I'm personally fine with the current state: it should be stable and work.
If there are any remaining _bugs_ that people know about, please send
fixes to me, but I think we can definitely leave the "free the unnecessary
memory" stuff to after 2.6.17.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
