Re: [openib-general] Re: possible bug in kmem_cache related code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/28/06, Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4/27/06, Or Gerlitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > With 2.6.17-rc3 I'm running into something which seems as a bug related
> > > to kmem_cache. Doing some allocations/deallocations from a kmem_cache and
> > > later attempting to destroy it yields the following message and trace

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Tested on 2.6.16.7 and works ok. Christoph, could this be related to
> > the cache draining patches that went in 2.6.17-rc1?

I can't reproduce this with Linus' git head on User-mode Linux running on
UP i386. Or, can you reproduce this at will? Any local modifications? Can
we see your .config, please.

Yes, i can reproduce this at will, no local modifications, my system
is amd dual
x86_64, i have attached my .config to the first email of this thread,
and also mentioned
that some CONFIG_DEBUG_ options are set, including one related to slab
debugging.

Also, by "User mode Linux" you mean linux kernel that runs as a user
process on your system?

Or.

Or.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux