Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] PATCH 0/4 - Time virtualization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Blaisorblade <[email protected]> writes:

> So we get back to Eric's objection (which I haven't understood but that's my 
> problem).

My objection is that to handle the monotonic timer we need an additional
struct timespec argument when we create the time namespace.

There does not appear to be space in clone or unshare to pass that value.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux