> A one time effort to write it *and sign it*. you don't sign nor need to sign perl or bash scripts. Why would a loader be written in ELF itself? There's absolutely no reason for that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- References:
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- From: Nix <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- From: Axelle Apvrille <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- From: "Ulrich Drepper" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- Prev by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- Next by Date: Re: Some Concrete AppArmor Questions - was Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
- Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Digsig 1.5: kernel module for run-timeauthentication of binaries
- Index(es):
 |