Hi!
> OK, I'm waiting for Nick to respond, then. :-)
>
> Still I'd like to change one more thing in the final patch. Namely,
> instead of this:
>
> @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ static int snapshot_ioctl(struct inode *
> case SNAPSHOT_UNFREEZE:
> if (!data->frozen)
> break;
> + if (data->ready && in_suspend) {
> + error = -EPERM;
> + break;
> + }
> down(&pm_sem);
> thaw_processes();
> enable_nonboot_cpus();
>
> I'd like to do:
>
> case SNAPSHOT_UNFREEZE:
> if (!data->frozen)
> break;
> + if (data->ready)
> + swsusp_free();
> down(&pm_sem);
> thaw_processes();
> enable_nonboot_cpus();
>
> so unfreeze() won't return the error.
Seems okay to me...
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
