Re: [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:05:44PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> +++ linux-2.6-patched/drivers/s390/s390mach.c	2006-04-24 16:47:28.000000000 +0200
...
> +#define MAX_IPD_TIME	(5 * 60 * 100 * 1000) /* 5 minutes */

I'm no s390 expert, but shouldn't the above use something like HZ?

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling.
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling.
    • From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
• Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] [3/4] i386: Fix overflow in e820_all_mapped
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling.
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]