Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller

On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:56 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> I'm also pretty sure, that CPU controller based on timeslice tricks 
> behaves poorly on burstable load patterns as well and with interactive 
> tasks. So before commiting I propose to perform a good testing on 
> different load patterns.

Yes, it can only react very slowly.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
    • From: MAEDA Naoaki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
    • From: Kirill Korotaev <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] [3/4] i386: Fix overflow in e820_all_mapped
• Next by Date: Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 04/16] ehca: userspace support
• Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
• Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]