Hi Mike,
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:25:35 +0200
Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 10:37 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > This patchset adds a CPU resource controller on top of Resource Groups.
> > The CPU resource controller manages CPU resources by scaling timeslice
> > allocated for each task without changing the algorithm of the O(1)
> > scheduler.
> >
> > Please consider these for inclusion in -mm tree.
>
> This patch set professes to be a resource controller, yet 100% of high
> priority tasks are uncontrolled. Distribution of CPU among high
> priority tasks isn't important, but distribution of what they leave
> behind is?
Do you mean niced tasks are uncontrolled by the controller?
TASK_INTERACTIVEs are left untouched intentionally, but niced tasks
are also controlled.
Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
