On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:19:30 -0700, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>I don't like dropping patches. Because then the thing needs to be fixed up
>and resent and remerged and re-reviewed and rejects need to re-fixed-up and
>this adds emailing overhead and 12-24 hour turnaround, etc. I very much
>prefer to hang onto the patch and get it fixed up. This means that I
>usually have to do the fixing-up.
Perhaps dropping patches with obvious faults with some feedback
to submitter may reduce your workload ;) And is slowing down the
merge a little in these cases such a bad thing if it improves
patch quality over time?
Grant.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
