Re: [git patch] fuse fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >> This function is called from everywhere, and so, it looks like it should 
> >> use SLAB_NOFS rather than SLAB_KERNEL.  I would audit every GFP_KERNEL 
> >> and SLAB_KERNEL usage, and consider replacing with SLAB_NOFS or GFP_NOFS.
> > 
> > GFP_NOFS doesn't make much sense, since mm never calls back into FUSE
> > anyway: FUSE writes through the page-cache, and hence never dirties
> > any pages.
> > 
> > I'll add a comment to fuse_request_alloc().
> 
> If you're using loop, particularly something insane like swapping over 
> loop, "the path" will certainly want to know that its passing through 
> the VFS layer, regardless of specific page cache behavior, AFAICS.

IIRC "loop" decouples the base filesystem from any user of the loop
device by a kernel thread and mediating buffers.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux