* Arjan van de Ven ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 06:15 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 April 2006 01:06, Ken Brush wrote:
> >
> > > > 2/ What advantages does AppArmor provide over techniques involving
> > > > virtualisation or gaol mechanisms? Are these advantages worth
> > > > while?
> >
> > I would guess the advantage is easier administration. e.g. I always
> > found it a PITA to synchronize files like /etc/resolv.conf and similar
> > files into chroots.
>
> there's another option than just chroots; construct a namespace with
> just the allowed files bind-mounted in. That is 100% scriptable and also
> doesn't have the "stale files" problem
That doesn't support different access modes aside of DAC, which defeats
the point. So either way, there's a need for better infrastructure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
