Andrew Morton wrote:
Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:
That's if we think -stable needs this fixed.
Let's say a bunch of read bio's get coalesced into a single
200+ sector request. This then fails on one single bad sector
out of the 200+. Without the patch, there is a very good chance
that sd.c will simply fail the entire request, all 200+ sectors.
With the patch, it will fail the first block, and then retry
the remaining blocks. And repeat this until something works,
or until everything has failed one by one.
Yowch. I have the feeling that this'll take our EIO-handling time from
far-too-long to far-too-long*200.
That's how it always used to work (eg. SUSE9 2.6.5+ kernels; Jens?).
What I need to have happen when a request is failed due to bad-media,
is have it split the request into a sequence of single-block requests
that are passed to the LLD one at a time. The ones with real bad
sectors will then be independently failed, and the rest will get done.
Much better. Much more complex.
I'm thinking about something like that, just not sure whether to put it
(initially) in libata, sd.c, or the block layer.
block, I suspect. My DVD trauma was IDE-induced. Jens is mulling the
problem - I'd suggest you coordinate with him.
I've been pinging Jens about it for a couple of weeks now; no response.
It would be a good thing to fix.
It's moderately hard to test, though. Easy enough for DVDs and CDs, but
it's harder to take a marker pen to a hard drive.
I have a bunch of "pre-marked" SATA drives here just for the purpose..
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
