Re: Lockless page cache test results

On Wed, Apr 26 2006, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We can speedup the lookups with find_get_pages(). The test does 64k max,
> so with luck we should be able to pull 16 pages in at the time. I'll try
> and run such a test. But boy I wish find_get_pages_contig() was there
> for that. I think I'd prefer adding that instead of coding that logic in
> splice, it can get a little tricky.

Here's such a run, graphed with the other two. I'll redo the lockless
side as well now, it's only fair to compare with that batching as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Attachment: lockless-2.png
Description: PNG image

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Next by Date: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Previous by thread: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Next by thread: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]