Re: Lockless page cache test results

Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Are there cases where the lockless page cache performs worse than the
> current one?

Yeah - when human beings try to understand and maintain it.

The usual tradeoffs apply ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: Lockless page cache test results
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?
• Next by Date: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Previous by thread: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Next by thread: Re: Lockless page cache test results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]